|
|
|
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local
Authorities > Stirling >
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for
that case.
| Case no: |
LA/S/943 |
| Date case started: |
04/Feb/10 |
| Report to Commission: |
29/Jun/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor John Hendry |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 5 on Declaration of Interests and section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.
|
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor John Hendry had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/885 |
| Date case started: |
02/Sep/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
25/Nov/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Graham Reed |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the Key Principles of Accountability and Stewardship and Openness in section 2, and the provisionsrelating to Taking Decisions on Individual Applications set out in paragraph 7.2 of the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Graham Reed has not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/714 |
| Date case started: |
09/Apr/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
31/Jul/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors Alasdair McPherson and Gerard O'Brien |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in sections 2 on Respect, paragraphs 3.20 on Dealings with the Council and paragraphs 7.3,7.6,7.8 and 7.11 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillors Alasdair McPherson and Gerard O'Brien had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/671 |
| Date case started: |
23/Jan/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
16/Apr/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Colin Finlay |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in sections 2 and 3 on Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Colin Finlay had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/667 |
| Date case started: |
23/Jan/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
31/Mar/08 |
| Allegation against: |
(former) Provost Margaret Brisley |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in section 5 on Declaration of Interests, and section 7 on Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that (former) Provost Margaret Brisley had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/160 |
| Date case started: |
17/Mar/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
17/Aug/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Gerard O'Brien |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in section 3 on General Conduct (paragraph 3.2 Relationship
with Council Employees). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Gerard O'Brien had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/S/28 |
| Date case started: |
27/Nov/03 |
| Report to Commission: |
14/Apr/04 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Margaret Brisley |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in section 7 on planning. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Brisley has not contravened the Councillors' Code
of Conduct. |
|
