|
|
|
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local
Authorities > North Lanarkshire>
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for
that case.
| Case no: |
LA/NL/887 |
| Date case started: |
02/Sep/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
14/Jan/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Stephen Grant |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Honesty and Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that
Councillor Stephen Grant had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/875 |
| Date case started: |
04/Aug/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
14/Jan/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Alan O’Brien |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Respect, sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 on Relationship with Council Employees, and paragraphs 2, 16 and 20 of Annex C on Respect and Public Comment. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Alan O’Brien had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/871 and 872 |
| Date case started: |
30/Jun/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
14/Jan/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Alan O’Brien |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 and Annex C on Respect; and in section 3 on the Separate Roles of Councillors and Council Employees, and on Dealings with the Council. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Alan O’Brien had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/868 |
| Date case started: |
10/Jun/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
22/Jan/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors Harry McGuigan and Richard Lyle |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Leadership and section 3 on Conduct in the Chamber or Committee. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillors Harry McGuigan and Richard Lyle had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/793 |
| Date case started: |
14/Nov/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
10/Feb/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Helen McKenna |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in paragraph 3.2 and paragraph 2 of the Annex C (Relationship with Council Employees) and paragraph 3.14 (Conduct in the Chamber or in Committee). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Helen McKenna had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/770,776 and 784 |
| Date case started: |
02/Sep/08, 09/Sep/08 and 30/Sep/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
23/Mar/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Alan O'Brien |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Leadership and Respect and section 3.14 on Conduct in the Chamber or Committee. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Alan O'Brien had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/744 |
| Date case started: |
20/Jun/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
25/Sep/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Barry McCulloch |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability and Stewardship, Openness, Honesty, Leadership and Respect, and paragraph 2.2 relating to Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Barry McCulloch had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/598 |
| Date case started: |
02/Jul/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Paul Delaney |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out insection 2 on Respect, and section 3 on Courtesy. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Paul Delaney had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/551 |
| Date case started: |
29/Mar/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
08/Jun/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Samuel Love |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 3 on Relations with Council Employees and Conduct in the Chamber or in Committee; and set out in section 7 on Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Samuel Love had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/520 |
| Date case started: |
24/Nov/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
22/Feb/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors James McCabe and James Smith |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraph 5.16 relating to the declaration of a financial interest. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillors James McCabe and James Smith had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/167 |
| Date case started: |
28/Feb/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
25/May/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Thomas Barrie |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct
set out in section 2 on Duty, Openness and Leadership and
section 7 on Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Thomas Barrie had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/NL/88 |
| Date case started: |
27/Jul/04 |
| Report to Commission: |
02/Nov/04 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor John Cassidy |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Duty and section 6.1 on Lobbying and Access
to Councillors. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor John Cassidy had not contravened the Councillors'
Code of Conduct. |
|
