|
|
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local
Authorities > Highland Council >
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for
that case.
| Case no: |
LA/H/1050,1051,1052,1054 and 1056 |
| Date case started: |
11/Oct/10 |
| Report to Commission: |
11/Jan/11 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Laurie Fraser |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the guidance set out in section 1 of the Councillors’ Code of Conduct; the principles of Objectivity, and Accountability and Stewardship contained in section 2; the provisions on General Conduct in section 3; and on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications in section 7. Reference was also made to the Protocol for Relations between Councillors and Employees set out in Annex C to the Code. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Laurie Fraser had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/904 |
| Date case started: |
02/Dec/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
28/Jun/10 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors John Holden, Robert Wynd and Glynis Sinclair |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 3 on Relationship with Council Employees; and in paragraphs 2, 16 and 20 of the Protocol for Relations between Councillors and Employees in Scottish Councils. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillors John Holden, Robert Wynd and Glynis Sinclair had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/818 |
| Date case started: |
28/Jan/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
07/May/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors William Clark and Edward Hunter |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 3 on Relationship with Council Employees, and in Annex C on Public Comment. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor William Clark and Edward Hunter have not controvened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/638 |
| Date case started: |
02/Nov/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
26/Jan/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Alasdair Rhind |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, Integrity, Accountability and Stewardship, and Honesty. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Alasdair Rhind had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/628
and LA/H/629 |
| Date case started: |
14/Nov/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
18/Feb/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor David Chisholm |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the key principles of Duty, Honesty
and Respect set out in section 2 of the Councillors'
Code of Conduct, and paragraph 3.21 of the Code which relates to the
Responsibilities to the Council as a Member of the Public. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor David Chisholm had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/610 |
| Date case started: |
16/Aug/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
05/Oct/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillors Thomas Prag and Roy Pederson |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out insection 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillors Prag and Pederson had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/602 |
| Date case started: |
03/Jul/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
24/Sep/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor James Gray |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out insection 5 on Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor James Gray had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/580 |
| Date case started: |
06/Jun/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
31/Oct/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Andrew Millar |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct, in particular, the key principle of Integrity contained in section 2.1, paragraphs 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.13, 3.20 in section 3 relating to General Conduct, paragraphs 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.11, 5.13, 5.16, 5.18 relating to Declaration of Interests, paragraph 6.3 relating to Lobbying and Access to Councillors and paragraphs 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11 relating to Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Andrew Millar had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/503 |
| Date case started: |
10/Oct/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
21/Dec/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Helen Carmichael |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in paragraph 1.1 of section 1 (Introduction to the Code
of Conduct) and several of the key principles in
section 2. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Helen Carmichael had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/393 |
| Date case started: |
19/Jan/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
27/Mar/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Clive Goodman |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in paragraph 3.20 on Dealings with the Council and
section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Clive Goodman had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/359 |
| Date case started: |
06/Dec/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
02/Mar/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Robert Wynd |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Robert Wynd had not contravened the Councillors'
Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/331 |
| Date case started: |
28/Sep/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
23/Feb/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Margaret MacLennan |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out
in section 3 on Gifts and Hospitality and section
7 on Dealing with Individual Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Margaret MacLennan had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/203 |
| Date case started: |
24/May/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
23/Aug/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor James Gray |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 4 of the Code which deals with Registration
of Interests and section 5 of the Code which deals with Declaration
of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor James Gray has not contravened the Councillors'
Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/H/43 |
| Date case started: |
30/Jan/04 |
| Report to Commission: |
13/Jul/04 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Alistair Rhind |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Honesty and sections 5.5 and
5.13 on Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Alistair Rhind had not contravened the
Councillors Code of Conduct. |
|
