header
Standards Commission
About Us
Acts, Codes and Regulations
Guidance and Dispensations
Investigations
Hearings
Cases No Action
Frequently Asked Questions
Press Information
Contact Us
Links
Vacancies
Home
 

Information on Investigations

Which Sector? > Local Authorities > Fife>

Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for that case.

Case no: LA/Fi/965
Date case started: 25/Mar/10
Report to Commission: 17/Jun/10
Allegation against:
Councillor Peter Grant
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty.

Outcome:

Decision that Councillor Peter Grant had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/733 and 738
Date case started: 01/Jul/08
Report to Commission: 29/Aug/08
Allegation against: Councillors Tim Brett, David Cunningham, Peter Grant, Alistair Hunter, Susan Leslie, Carol Lindsay, David MacDiarmid, Elizabeth Riches, David Torrance and Marilyn Whitehead.
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, Integrity, Openness and Honesty.
Outcome:

Decision that Councillors Tim Brett, David Cunningham, Peter Grant, Alistair Hunter, Susan Leslie, Carol Lindsay, David MacDiarmid, Elizabeth Riches, David Torrance and Marilyn Whitehead had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/599
Date case started: 05/Jul/07
Report to Commission: 13/Sep/07
Allegation against: Councillor William Kay
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraphs 3.18 and 3.19 (Appointments to Partner Organisations), section 4 (Registration of Interests) and section 5 (Declaration of Interests)
Outcome:

Decision that Councillor William Kay had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/542
Date case started: 23/Mar/07
Report to Commission: 21/Sep/07
Allegation against: Councillor Mike Rumney and former Councillor Anne McGovern.
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in section 2 of the Councillors' Code of Conduct regarding the key principles of Objectivity, Accountability and Stewardship, Openness, Honesty, Leadership and Respect and paragraph 3.14 relating to Conduct in the Chamber.
Outcome:

Decision that Councillors Mike Rumney and Anne McGovern had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/467
Date case started: 25/Aug/06
Report to Commission: 03/Oct/06
Allegation against: Councillor Kay Morrison
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 7 on Taking Decisions on individual applications (Planning Applications).
Outcome:

Decision that Councillor Kay Morrison had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/453, 458, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466 and 476
Date case started: 27/Jul/06
Report to Commission: 16/Oct/06
Allegation against: Councillors Anne R McGovern, Margot Doig, William Brand, Pat Callaghan, James Brennan, Henry T Blyth, Irene Connelly, Andrew Keddie, Agnes J Smith, John Cameron, Alexander Sawers, Thomas Dair, Gordon Duff, Drew Edward, Mike Rumney, William Kay, Kay Morrison, Fiona Purdon, Catherine Latto, Theresa Gunn, Alan C Kenney, Andrew Brown, Robert Young, Jim Philp, David C Arnott, James Connelly, Archibald Lowe, Ron A Edwards, Fraser Ballantyne, George Allan, William Aitken, John Mackenzie, John Simpson, Alexander M Thomson and Andrew Paterson.
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct in relation to the Key Principles of Objectivity and Accountability and Stewardship as set out in section 2, the requirements in section 6 in relation to Lobbying and Access to Councillors, and the provisions of section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.
Outcome:

Decision that  Councillors Anne R McGovern, Margot Doig, William Brand, Pat Callaghan, James Brennan, Henry T Blyth, Irene Connelly, Andrew Keddie, Agnes J Smith, John Cameron, Alexander Sawers, Thomas Dair, Gordon Duff, Drew Edward, Mike Rumney, William Kay, Kay Morrison, Fiona Purdon, Catherine Latto, Theresa Gunn, Alan C Kenney, Andrew Brown, Robert Young, Jim Philp, David C Arnott, James Connelly, Archibald Lowe, Ron A Edwards, Fraser Ballantyne, George Allan, William Aitken, John Mackenzie, John Simpson, Alexander M Thomson and Andrew Paterson had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

Case no: LA/Fi/394
Date case started: 19/Jan/06
Report to Commission: 28/Apr/06
Allegation against: Councillor Peter Grant
Nature of allegation: Breach of the key principle of Leadership contained in section 2.1 of the Code and provisions in section 3 of the Code requiring councillors and employees to act with mutual courtesy and respect.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Peter Grant had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/E/376, LA/Fi/376, LA/PK/376 and LA/WL/376
Date case started: 23/Jan/06
Report to Commission: 30/Mar/06
Allegation against: Councillors Andrew Burns, Ian Murray, Lawrence Marshall and George Grubb of the City of Edinburgh Council; Councillors John Cameron, Alice McGarry, Mike Rumney and Antony Martin of Fife Council; Councillor Robert Scott of Perth and Kinross Council, and Councillor David King of West Lothian Council ("the respondents"). The respondents are also members of the Forth Estuary Transport Authority (FETA).
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 1 relating to Guidance on the Code, section 2 relating to the Key Principles, section 4 relating to Registration of Interests and section 5 relating to Declaration of Interest.
Outcome: Decision that the respondents named above had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/Fi/207
Date case started: 20/May/05
Report to Commission: 18/Aug/05
Allegation against: Councillor Margaret Taylor
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, Selflessness, Accountability and Stewardship, Openness and Honesty, paragraph 3.3 Relationship with Council Employees, section 5 Declaration of Interests, section 6 Lobbying and Access to Councillors, section 7 all paragraphs relating to Taking Decisions on Individual Applications, except paragraphs 7.1, 7.4 and 7.6 and Annex C paragraph 6 on Office Bearers.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Margaret Taylor had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/Fi/153
Date case started: 13/Jan/05
Report to Commission: 10/Jun/05
Allegation against: A Councillor (deceased)
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraphs 7.3, 7.10 and 7.11 relating to Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.
Outcome: Decision that the Councillor had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/Fi/127/HW
Date case started: 13/Dec/04
Report to Commission: 11/Apr/05
Allegation against: A Councillor (deceased)
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraphs 7.9 and 7.10 in respect of conduct relating to planning applications.
Outcome: Decision that the Councillor had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/Fi/93 and LA/Fi/100
Date case started: 15/Jul/04
Report to Commission: 06/Dec/04
Allegation against: A Councillor (deceased)
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty and Leadership.
Outcome: Decision that the Councillor had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/Fi/79
Date case started: 27/May/04
Report to Commission: 28/Oct/2004
Allegation against: Councillor Marilyn Whitehead
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty and Selflessness, and section 7 on Taking Decisions on Planning Applications.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Marilyn Whitehead had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
* *
*
© Standards Commission for Scotland 2002-08