header
Standards Commission
About Us
Acts, Codes and Regulations
Guidance and Dispensations
Investigations
Hearings
Cases No Action
Frequently Asked Questions
Press Information
Contact Us
Links
Vacancies
Home
 

Information on Investigations

Which Sector? > Local Authorities > Angus>

Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for that case.

Case no:

LA/An/979

Date case started: 08/Apr/10
Report to Commission: 10/Aug/10
Allegation against: Councillor David Fairweather
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the provisions in section 2 of the Councillors’ Code of Conduct relating to Respect and in paragraph 3.14 relating to Conduct in the Chamber or Committee.

Outcome:
Decision that Councillor David Fairweather had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/921

Date case started: 09/Mar/10
Report to Commission: 10/Aug/10
Allegation against: Councillor Alex King
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Respect.

Outcome:
Decision that Councillor Alex King had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/884

Date case started: 25/Aug/09
Report to Commission: 12/Nov/09
Allegation against: Councillor Margaret Thomson
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the key principles of Duty, Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability and Stewardship, Openness, Honesty and Leadership contained in section 2 of the Code, and the provisions on Declaration of Interests set out in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.5, 5.14 and 5.18.

Outcome:
Decision that Councillor Maragret Thomson had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/862

Date case started: 26/May/09
Report to Commission: 12/Nov/09
Allegation against: Councillor David Fairweather
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out Section 5 (Declarations of Interest) and Section 7 (Taking Decisions on Individual Applications).

Outcome:
Decision that Councillor David Fairweather had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/857

Date case started: 29/May/09
Report to Commission: 24/Sep/09
Allegation against: Councillors Ian Mackintosh and Robert Myles
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conductset out in section 4 on Registration of Interest, and section 5 on Declaration of Interests.

Outcome:
Decision that Councillors Ian Mackintosh and Robert Myles have not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/832,834,840

Date case started: 25/Mar/09
Report to Commission: 06/Aug/09
Allegation against: Councillor Robert Myles
Nature of allegation:

Breach of the Key Principle of Respect in section 2 of the Councillors’ Code of Conduct; also paragraph 3.14 relating to Conduct in the Chamber and the provisions in paragraph 7.11 regarding Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.

Outcome:
Decision that Councillor Robert Myles had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/740

Date case started: 30/May/08
Report to Commission: 23/Sep/08
Allegation against: Councillor David Fairweather
Nature of allegation:
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in paragraphs 4.18 and 4.19 (Registration of Interests/Houses, Land and Buildings) and paragraphs 5.12 and 5.13 (Declaration of Interests/ The Interests of Other Persons).
Outcome:
Decision that Councillor David Fairweather had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/687

Date case started: 19/Feb/08
Report to Commission: 14/May/08
Allegation against: Councillor Alex King
Nature of allegation:
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 7 (paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3), on Dealing with Planning Applications.
Outcome:
Decision that Councillor Alex King had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/668

Date case started: 18/Feb/08
Report to Commission: 14/May/08
Allegation against: Councillor Helen Oswald
Nature of allegation:
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 7 (paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3), on Dealing with Planning Applications.
Outcome:
Decision that Councillor Helen Oswald had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/660

Date case started: 05/Dec/07
Report to Commission: 14/May/08
Allegation against: Councillor Ruth Leslie Melville
Nature of allegation: Alleged breach of Key Principles and of paragraphs 5.15 and 5.19 relating to Declarations of Interest and paragraphs 7.3, 7.4 and 7.7 relating to Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Ruth Leslie Melville had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/657

Date case started: 16/Jan/08
Report to Commission: 04/Mar/08
Allegation against: Councillor Ruth Leslie Melville
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out insection 2 on Leadership and Respect.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Ruth Leslie Melville had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no:

LA/An/616

Date case started: 12/Sep/07
Report to Commission: 08/Jan/08
Allegation against: Councillor Iain Gaul
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Iain Gaul had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/An/423
Date case started: 16/May/06
Report to Commission: 16/Aug/06
Allegation against: Councillor Kathleen M Ritchie JP
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 (Key Principles), and section 3 (General Conduct)
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Kathleen M Ritchie JP had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/An/120
Date case started: 22/Oct/04
Report to Commission: 11/Mar/05
Allegation against: Councillor Alexander King
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct relating to Confidentiality, set out in paragraphs 3.15 and 3.16.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor King had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/An/91 & 97
Date case started: 21/Jul/04
Report to Commission: 01/Nov/04
Allegation against: Councillors Stewart McGlynn and Helen Oswald
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Accountability and Stewardship, Openness and Respect, and section 5 on Declaration of Interest.
Outcome: Decision that Councillors Stewart McGlynn and Helen Oswald had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
Case no: LA/An/75
Date case started: 10/Jun/04
Report to Commission: 30/Sep/04
Allegation against: Councillor Alexander King
Nature of allegation: Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in sections 5.17 and 5.18 on Declaration of Interests.
Outcome: Decision that Councillor Alexander King had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct.

 

* *
*
© Standards Commission for Scotland 2002-08