|
|
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local
Authorities > Scottish Borders Council >
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for
that case.
| Case no: |
LA/SB/878 |
| Date case started: |
04/Aug/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
03/Nov/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Neil Calvert |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in paragraphs 4.18, 4.19, 4.21 (Registration of Interests), 5.1 to 5.7, 5.9, 5.13 to 5.16, 5.18 (Declaration of Interests), 6.1 to 6.4 (Lobbying and Access to Councillors), 7.2, 7.3 and 7.11 (Taking Decisions on Individual Applications). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Neil Calvert had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/831 |
| Date case started: |
13/Mar/09 |
| Report to Commission: |
08/Apr/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Catriona Bathia |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provision in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Catriona Bathia had not contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/786 |
| Date case started: |
08/Oct/08 |
| Report to Commission: |
07/Jan/09 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Gavin Logan |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Duty, Selflessness Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability and Stewardship, Leadership and Respect and paragraph 3.14 on Conduct in the Chamber or in the Committee Room. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Gavin Logan had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/659 |
| Date case started: |
03/Dec/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
22/Feb/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Carolyn Riddell-Carre |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in paragraphs 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.13 and 5.18 (Declaration
of Interests). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Carolyn Riddell-Carre had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/653 |
| Date case started: |
03/Dec/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
15/Feb/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Nicholas Watson |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in paragraph 4.21 (Registration of Non-Financial Interests),
paragraphs 5.3, 5.9 and 5.19 (Declaration of Interests)
and paragraphs 7.3, 7.10 and 7.11 (Taking Decisions on Individual
Applications). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Nicholas Watson had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/592 |
| Date case started: |
15/Jun/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
14/Sep/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Kenneth Gunn |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 5 on Declaration of Interests and section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Kenneth Gunn had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/438 |
| Date case started: |
14/Jul/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
28/Sep/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Catriona Bhatia |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in paragraph 5.11 relating to Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Catriona Bhatia had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/398 |
| Date case started: |
01/Feb/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
17/May/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Douglas Younger |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in sections 4 and 5 relating to Registration and Declaration
of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Douglas Younger had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/339 |
| Date case started: |
15/Sep/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
07/Dec/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Andrew Farquhar |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Andrew Farquhar had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/217,218 |
| Date case started: |
10/Aug/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
07/Dec/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Andrew Farquhar and Councillor Kenneth McCartney. |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Respect. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Andrew Farquhar and Councillor Kenneth
McCartney had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/206 |
| Date case started: |
16/May/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
09/Jun/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Hugh Wight |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on Duty. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Hugh Wight had not contravened the Councillors'
Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/202 |
| Date case started: |
28/Apr/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
25/Jul/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Carolyn Riddell-Carre |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct relating
to Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Carolyn Riddell-Carre had not contravened
the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/146,
154, 155, 158 |
| Date case started: |
05/Jan/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
31/Mar/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor David Richardson |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 on key principles of Duty and Leadership. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor David Richardson had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/SB/104 |
| Date case started: |
24/Sep/04 |
| Report to Commission: |
03/Dec/04 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Sandy Scott and Councillor David Parker |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 2 relating to Integrity, Accountability and Stewardship,
Openness, Honesty, Leadership, and Objectivity. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Sandy Scott and Councillor David Parker
had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
|
