 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local Authorities > Midlothian Council >
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for that case.
| Case no: | LA/Mi/631, LA/Mi/676 and LA/Mi/677 |
| Date case started: | 31/Oct/07 |
| Report to Commission: | 25/Jul/08 |
| Allegation against: | Councillors Jack Aitchison and Alex Bennett |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors’ Code of Conduct set out in section 5 on Declaration of Interests and in particular paragraphs 5.3 and 5.18. |
| Outcome: | The Chief Investigating Officer reported to the Standards Commission he had concluded that Councillors Jack Aitchison and Alex Bennett had contravened the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. The Commission’s decision on this case can be read by clicking here. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/651 |
| Date case started: | 09/Nov/07 |
| Report to Commission: | 25/Feb/08 |
| Allegation against: | Councillor Lisa Beattie |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 7 on Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillor Lisa Beattie had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/626 |
| Date case started: | 21/Sep/07 |
| Report to Commission: | 12/Feb/08 |
| Allegation against: | Councillor Peter Boyes |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraph 5.13 relating to the Declaration of Interests; and 7.2 and 7.11 relating to Dealing with Planning Applications. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillor Peter Boyes had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/601 |
| Date case started: | 02/Jul/07 |
| Report to Commission: | 16/Aug/07 |
| Allegation against: | Councillor Adam Montgomery |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraph 3.5 on Allowances. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillor Adam Montgomery had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/356 |
| Date case started: | 12/Nov/05 |
| Report to Commission: | 23/Dec/05 |
| Allegation against: | Councillor Sheila Thacker and Councillor Raymond Prior |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 5 in respect of Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillors Sheila Thacker and Councillor Raymond Prior had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/156 |
| Date case started: | 12/Apr/05 |
| Report to Commission: | 26/Jul/05 |
| Allegation against: | Councillors Russell Imrie and Adam Montgomery |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, Selflessness, Integrity, and Accountability and Stewardship; section 3 on Appointments to Partner Organisations; section 4 on Registration of Interests; and section 5 on Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillors Russell Imrie and Adam Montgomery had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: | LA/Mi/151 |
| Date case started: | 19/Jan/05 |
| Report to Commission: | 23/Mar/05 |
| Allegation against: | Councillors David Fletcher, Adam Montgomery, Keith McIntosh, Sheila Thacker and Russell Imrie |
| Nature of allegation: | Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in paragraph 5.3 on Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: | Decision that Councillors David Fletcher, Adam Montgomery, Keith McIntosh, Sheila Thacker and Russell Imrie had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
© Standards Commission for Scotland 2002-08