|
|
Information on Investigations
Which Sector? > Local
Authorities > Dundee City>
Please click on individual case number to view full case summary for
that case.
| Case no: |
LA/D/647 |
| Date case started: |
07/Nov/07 |
| Report to Commission: |
18/Jan/08 |
| Allegation against: |
Lord Provost John Letford |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 1 (Introduction), section 2 (Key
Principles), paragraphs 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 (General
Conduct), paragraph 3.20 (Dealings with the Council)
and paragraphs 6.1 to 6.3 (Lobbying and Access to Councillors). |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Lord Provost John Letford had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/D/515 |
| Date case started: |
10/Nov/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
16/May/07 |
| Allegation against: |
Councillor Neil Powrie |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set out in section 2 on Duty, section 5 on Declaration of Interests and section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual Applications. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Councillor Neil Powrie had not contravened the Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/D/439 |
| Date case started: |
07/Jun/06 |
| Report to Commission: |
06/Sep/06 |
| Allegation against: |
Lord Provost John Letford and Councillors Julie Sturrock and Charles
Webster |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 7 on Taking Decisions on Individual
Applications and
section 5 on Declaration of Interests. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Lord Provost John Letford and Councillors Julie Sturrock
and Charles Webster had not contravened the Councillors' Code of
Conduct. |
| Case no: |
LA/D/193 |
| Date case started: |
17/May/05 |
| Report to Commission: |
01/Nov/05 |
| Allegation against: |
Lord Provost John Letford |
| Nature of allegation: |
Breach of the provisions in the Councillors' Code of Conduct set
out in section 3 and paragraph 2 of Annex C on Relationship
with Council Employees, and paragraph 20 of Annex C on Public
Comment, and paragraphs 3.15 and 3.16 of the Code on Confidentiality
Requirements. |
| Outcome: |
Decision that Lord Provost John Letford had not contravened the
Councillors' Code of Conduct. |
|
